Let’s have a little fun with the Federal budget, to maybe get some
perspective on what to cut. First off, as of fiscal 2011 (year ended
September 30, 2011), we spent $3.6 trillion… but only took in $2.3
trillion. Hence our $1.3 trillion annual Federal budget deficit.
So if we can’t raise revenue, we need to come up with ~$1,300
billion in cost cuts. Let’s look at some common ones thrown out there by
our politicians, when they are trying to avoid giving a hard answer to a hard
question (which is invariably)…
Like Governor Romney’s recent (and way over-publicized) comments
about firing Big Bird. So let’s shut down the entire Corporation for
Public Broadcasting which funds among other things, PBS, NPR and the show that
his Presidential debate moderator, Jim Lehrer, hosts. And let’s get rid
of those hippie-loving National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities.
Art, history and philosophy is for losers anyway. And do we really need
to keep track of what our politicians say? They never deliver on what
said. So take out the National Archives as well. And the world
already totally loves America, right? So get rid of the Broadcasting
Board of Governors, the guys who run Voice of America and Radio Free
America. And what have those foreigners done for us lately, anyway?
So no more Peace Corps. Further, I find museums boring. So no more
Smithsonian Institution. Aside from looking after Indiana Jones’ ark, I
have no idea what they really do anyway.
That’s a good start, right? Sounds like we made some
progress. So where does all that chopping get us? That has reduced
our gaping $1,300 billion annual deficit too… $1,297 billion. That’s
it! Take away, forever-more going forward, all that those institutions
contribute to our culture, in exchange for barely even scratching the surface
of our annual problem. That is not a good cost-benefit plan.
OK so what about NASA? Their total budget is $18 billion,
and only $8 billion of that is actual science and exploration. The rest
of it is for stuff like babysitting our satellites. So take out the
National Science Foundation (the “NASA” of all things not in space), which is
only $7 billion. The Small Business Administration? $6
billion. Federal Communications Commission? $9 billion. The
Environmental Protection Agency? $11 billion. Corps of
Engineers? $10 billion. The entire Department of the Interior
(mostly runs our parks and preserves and, oh yeah, regulates guys like
BP)? $14 billion. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA)? $ 5 billion.
Take out all of those as well (which is unrealistic), and we still
have a $1,217 billion problem. Every year. Defund all of those
programs, and we have only reduced our current deficit by 6%. So whenever
you hear anyone suggest the above, you are free and clear to roll your eyes and
stop listening to them.
The vast majority of our $3.6 trillion budget is some form of
social subsidy, entitlement or welfare transfer payment. Basically the
cumulative result of our politicians trying to buy our votes over the
years. Perusing the budget, I added-up almost $2.4 trillion in effective
hand-outs. Two-thirds of it! All basically mandatory, meaning can’t
be cut without changing the law. Which requires Democrats and Republicans
cooperating (which I think they actually will do into the next term).
$780 billion of that was Social Security payments. $760 billion was for
Medicare and Medicaid. (Both net of receipts from the public). The
rest is stuff like benefits for Veterans and civilian government employees,
unemployment insurance, food stamps, Section 8-like housing, farm aid, etc.
I also identified ~$750 billion in expenditure related to defense
and security. That ranges from Army/Navy/Air force to FBI, DEA, ATF,
Bureau of Prisons, Secret Service, Coast Guard, Capitol Police, etc. But
it excludes Veterans’ and other related benefits (they’re subsidies).
(Now this won’t add up perfectly doing it this way because of
inter-agency eliminations and unallocated disbursements but…)
In fact, after combing through every single line item, I could
only find about $365 billion of that $3.6 trillion that was actually for
operating the government; and not some form of hand-out, or defense and
security related, or the gross interest on the debt (which is now over $450
billion, even in this super-low interest rate environment, by the way), or
payoffs to foreigners (which I could only find about $33 billion).
In other words, if you shut down the entire operating government unrelated
to defense and security that would only reduce our annual deficit by less than
one-third.
So we can raise revenue. We can raise taxes and kick an
already weak economy in the ribs. Or we can pray or figure out how to
grow the economy itself. Income and payroll taxes in fiscal 2011 were
$2.1 trillion – the vast majority of the Federal government’s $2.3 trillion
revenues. It is also 14% of GDP (national income approximates national
output). In 2006 when the economy was stronger (and with the same tax
rates as 2011 basically, except for some temporary present forgiveness), those
taxes were 16.7% of GDP.
So if we could strengthen the economy, get people working again
like 2006, just using this simplistic and sloppy back-of-the-envelope math, that
could add ~$400 billion in revenue right there without raising taxes on
anyone. Cut our debt in half (where we were just four years ago), and
interest on it drops by maybe ~$100-150 billion. Go back to a pre-“War on
Terror” style of defense/security, that could save ~$100-150 billion. And
I believe there's ~$50-100 billion of Recovery Act related and/or depressed
economy expenditure that would go away.
So that right there takes out maybe ~$500-700 billion. But
that still leaves a ~700 billion hole to fill. And, PS, there is
absolutely no guarantee that our economy or debts will return any time soon to
pre-financial crisis levels. The only thing left at that point is I)
raise taxes (when the economy is fit) or II) cut social hand-outs – the lion’s share
of the latter being Medicare/Medicaid and Social Security. Or do both.
This is the conversation that our elected representatives need to
be having with us. (And before the elections.) It’s going to have
to come from everywhere – and that includes higher taxes on everyone, as well
as cutting social subsidies promised to us over the years, but now cannot be
delivered as promised.
So it might be easy to laugh at Governor Romney suggesting we fire
Big Bird. At least for Democrats. But aside from their laughter, I
don’t hear anything serious coming from the Democrats either. That’s
because they all know about the substance of the above analysis. And they
are doing everything they can to avoid having to talk to us about that.
But we’re going to have to talk about it at some point. And
I really hope we start to, before the world currency and bond markets force us
to. Because at that point, it’s too late. So, OK... "ha ha ha,
fire Big Bird..." now please let’s dust-off the Simpson-Bowles Plan and
get the conversation going already.
Source doc from Dept. of the Treasury... http://www.fms.treas.gov/mts/mts0911.pdf
ReplyDeleteAnd My work product on Excel is available on request.